River Teeth Revisted

Complicating Chronology: Non-linear Narrative in “The Deer I Shot”

April 2, 2024

By Katie Mathew

The speed of sound is 1,128 feet per second. My bullet traveled close to 2,000 feet per second. His hoof hung there, over the snow, still with death for a full twenty seconds. His eyes rolled up and his lips and nostrils twitched. There was no blood.

~ “The Deer I Shot” by Michael R. Shea (River Teeth 13.2, Spring 2012)

Telling stories from the chronological beginning is arguably the “default” plot structure. Freytag’s Pyramid is a common device used by writers to plot their stories, starting with the exposition, moving to the rising action, to the climax, to the falling action, and finally to a resolution. But is this traditional structure, while helpful and proven to be successful, the only effective mode of storytelling? In “The Deer I Shot” from RT 13.2, Michael R. Shea uses a nonlinear narrative—or a narrative that does not follow the chronological order of events—to tell the story of shooting a deer for the first time, as well as the killing’s aftermath. 

While “The Deer I Shot” ends in a place that is the chronological end, the journey to that point weaves between different points of time to stitch together the full story. If this essay were told in chronological order, it might start in the deer stand as the narrator shot the buck, move to his celebrating, then collecting the deer, taking it to the butcher, coming home to his family for their reactions, and then, ultimately, ending in that last scene where he’s writing the essay with venison cooking on the stove. Instead, the essay begins with the image of his freezer full of deer meat, then to him at the butcher, and then to the deer stand where he shot the deer. The rest of the essay moves between other events, constantly returning to that moment in the woods when the narrator shot the deer. 

Read the following excerpt and think about the transition between points in time:

As I drove away from the deer’s dismemberment, my thoughts began to shift. There was a moment, as I pointed my gun, when the barrel hit the tree stand with a metal-on-metal cling. The deer froze. His body was still except his nose, except those twitching nostrils. Twenty feet up, I froze, too. He looked at me. I thought we made eye contact.

Sometimes the transition between events is seamless—such as the transition from the drive to the moment where the narrator thought he looked the deer in the eyes—but, at other times, it is a bit jarring.

Take a look at this next excerpt and try to see why this next time jump is less smooth, and what the effect is:

We did not make eye contact. But in that moment, I thought he did. I thought he looked at me, then looked away. And then I pulled the trigger.

“Just like The Deer Hunter,” my mom said. “Remember that movie?”

“Don’t trivialize this,” I said.

“Did you cry?” my sister said.

“Don’t tell me anymore,” my mother said. “I’m going to cry.”

The end of the paragraph before is an intimate scene where the reader feels as though they are in the moment where the narrator is looking the deer in the eye. While the transition into the scene is smooth because the narrator describes his mind going back to that moment, the transition to the next moment in time is more jarring. This is because, instead of introducing the next time skip, Shea throws us directly into the scene with dialogue, giving the reader little time to adjust. 

This moving back and forth between events acts almost as flashback in the way that flashbacks oftentimes bring us back to a traumatic or otherwise significant event. However, flashback in linear narratives is different from nonlinear narratives where the story jumps between past and present. Flashbacks appear in linear stories wherein the plot follows a chronological order of events, interrupting the narrative to provide context or background. Nonlinear narratives move between times to stitch together a plot that does not need to be—and, in many cases, cannot be told correctly—in chronological order. The scenes set in the past are not flashbacks because they are scenes that act as plot points rather than context.

Nonlinear storytelling can be tricky to get right because it is very easy to confuse readers by moving in a non-chronological order of events. And despite the short length of “The Deer I Shot” compared to the number of jumps in time, Shea is able to compile a story that is easy to follow because Shea moves us back and forth between just a handful of moments.  

Because the act of killing the deer itself isn’t what the essay’s about, it makes sense that the essay would start after the deer is dead. However, because the killing is what incites the narrator to reflect on their character and sense of self, it also makes sense that the most frequented event is that moment in the deer stand. This brings more attention to the event and emphasizes its importance and impact on the narrator. Going back to the conversation between the narrator and his mother about The Deer Hunter movie, we can see this impact in the two words he says in response to his mother’s question of how he feels after shooting the deer: “It’s complicated.” The non-linear structure of this essay reflects these feelings by straying from the familiar linear narrative to a more unconventional one that complicates the narrative. 


Step 1: Chronologically write out the events of a linear story you’ve already written in the format of a timeline.

Step 2: Cut out those events and mix them around into a non-chronological configuration.

Step 3: Repeat Step 2 until you find a configuration that intrigues you. 

Step 4: Write the story in the order of events from that configuration.

Step 5: Analyze what was added, what was taken away, and what changed in the new draft. Compare to the original draft. 

Katie Mathew is an ice cream enthusiast, Oxford comma advocate, and writer. Her work in both fiction and nonfiction tends to be rooted in rural settings where she feels the most at home.

Photo by Clyde He on Unsplash

Other River Teeth Revisited …

Black and white photo of church buildings with scaffolding

Outline as Structure: Scaffolding in a “Dark Barn”

By Micah Gjeltema
"When telling a true story, the “worldbuilding” is predetermined—the world of the essay is you, the writer, and all that you know. The context is as vast as experience, and the scope of the real resists containment. How can it possibly be shaped?"

“Terrible Sanity” and the Art of Narrative

In “Terrible Sanity” (20.2), Sam Pickering wanders through his own life, lamenting the present and celebrating the past. At once dismissive of sentimentality and profoundly personal, the essay stands as both an ode to education and a yearning for simpler times. For those familiar with the film Dead Poet’s Society (1989), this approach to life should feel familiar; Pickering was actually the inspiration for Robin Williams’s character, John Keating, and this essay contains all the hallmarks and personality one would expect from such a dynamic individual.

Pickering makes fantastic use of scaffolding in “Terrible Sanity”—that is, he anchors both the essay and the reader to a single point and builds the rest of the essay from there.

Anchoring and Questioning: Tracing Research and Reflection in Leonard Winograd’s “The Physics of Sorrow”

Leonard Winograd’s essay “The Physics of Sorrow,” found in River Teeth 21.1, provides a perfect example of the proper roles of research and reflective questioning. Of research as a tool for structural framework and an attempt to make sense of the inexplicable mysteries of life. Of questions not as a cheap deflection tactic, but an avenue for reflection and an invitation for readers to invest in the narrative. Of bridging that ever-looming gap we face as writers: write to make sense of yourself, but write in a way that others can make sense of you, too.

“The Babysitter” by Anton DiSclafani: Writing the Braided Essay

I’ll admit it—I’m a sucker for a good woven essay. Call it a braided or challah essay, give it two strands, give it four. I’m drawn to them, and when I read a good one, I find myself pulling the pieces apart, trying to master the art of it. It’s not something I tend to lean toward in my own writing. When I’ve experimented with writing braided essays in the past, I’ve often felt the parts were too disparate, and I struggled to find that all-important connection between the threads. A good braided essay takes a few sections—maybe a few different periods in one’s life for example—and weaves them together, back and forth, until the connections between the strands becomes clear. I love to read and admire a good braided essay. Anton DiSclafani’s “The Babysitter,” included in River Teeth 19.2, is an exceptionally instructive example of the form.

Pacing & Tempo Possibilities for Micro Essays: A Beautiful Things Analysis

As a young singer, one of my largest challenges was learning how to control my breathing. Long phrases defied me; I would expend all of my air before the end of the line, resulting in an embarrassing wheeze as I struggled to sing the final notes. How many writers have encountered something similar while trying to write in compressed forms, such as flash and micro? So much to say—take a deep breath—but then, all too soon, the word counter on the bottom of the document tells the sad truth: no words left! The breath's run out! So the essay wraps up too quickly, a last gasp at whatever truth the writer wanted to tell.

“Almost Thirty” by Rachel Weaver: A Balancing Act in Narrative Rhythm

One of the most important lessons I’ve learned in writing creative nonfiction is that, when in doubt, sometimes the best way to write about a thing is to write about something else entirely. Rachel Weaver uses this technique to great effect in her essay, "Almost Thirty" (River Teeth, Volume 20, Number 2, Spring 2019)—one of my favorites of the essays I’ve recently read. If you haven’t read it, read it now.

The main narrative of this essay takes place over a short span of time and follows a plot arc that’s about as straightforward as you can get: some friends go skating; the narrator falls through the ice; she manages to climb back out. But of course, the narrator’s physical actions aren’t what this essay is really about. They’re just the framework.

Allusion as Structure in Sean Ironman’s “And I Will Give You As Many Roast Bones As You Need”

Sean Ironman’s essay, “And I Will Give You As Many Roast Bones As You Need”** (River Teeth, Volume 21, Number 1, Fall 2019)—is the longest essay in River Teeth 21.1, and in the same way its name winds and wends, so too does the essay, bridging memory and history and theory together to form one long road that leads its way through the many ways humans and dogs have loved each other and lived together over the years.


All River Teeth subscriptions and back issues are available for purchase or renewal through Submittable! River Teeth: A Journal of Nonfiction Narrative (ISSN 1544-1849) is published semiannually. Issues are distributed in the fall and spring.


River Teeth accepts submissions of creative nonfiction through Submittable from September 1 to December 1 and January 1 to April 1.